Communications Network
Vast Empire  -  New Posts  -  Search  -  Statistics  -  Login 
 
ComNet > Neutral Messages > Archived Lounge > A very controversial issue
 
 
  Pages:  [ 1 2 ]   
Author
Topic:  A very controversial issue
Argon Viper
ComNet Expert
 
[VE-ARMY] Sergeant Major
[VE-VEEC] Senior Writer
 
Post Number:  1789
Total Posts:  1789
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 9, 2002 5:13:33 PM    View the profile of Argon Viper 
All right, I assume that most of you have heard of or don't care enough about the fact that the words "Under God" have been removed from the US Pledge of Alliegence.  Anyways, I found an interesting article here: http://www.secweb.org/asset.asp?AssetID=220 Anyways, those of you who debate here know my religious orientation, so take a guess at which side it takes  If you still can't tell, here's some nice quotes from it: "Ask yourself this: why is it so important to public life (and I think it clearly is) that atheists remain politely invisible, thank you very much?  I, naturally, have a hypothesis I rather like that explains this, besides explaining the angry raving of the masses of rogues who stood up to denounce the clear and simple justice pronounced by an honest judge.  I think, if you're honest, the reason is clear enough:  I think the only reason this is such a big deal, the only reason those words are there in the first place is an unvoiced, but unmistakable fear.  That fear is: that the only reason anyone believes in this god is they think everyone else does." - AJ Milne "First, note that hatred of atheists is nothing new. It's actually common to at least three of the world's major religions, and we find records of it thousands of years old. In the sacred books of Hinduism, of Islam, of Christianity, and of Judaism, we find this common thread. (Atheists might take this as a minor point of pride, insofar as evidence is excellent they may well be one of the more ancient of belief systems; apparently they were around to annoy even the writer of the Psalms.)" - AJ Milne Enjoy 
 
-----------------------
Argon Viper
IW COL Argon Viper{ret}
"History is on the move, those who cannot keep up will watch from a distance, and those who get in our way will not watch at all" - Grand Admiral Thrawn
"In combat, second place is only the last to die."- Anonymous
"Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses" - Carl G Jung
"The only thing that will never change is that everything will change" - Argon Viper
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 9, 2002 7:00:58 PM    View the profile of JMac 
This country was founded on a firm belief in God.  We didn't care if you were a Quaker, a Protestant, a Catholic, a Jew.  Our declaration of independence states this, on our money is "In God We Trust", the president swears on the bible "so help me God", and in our coursts we have suspects swear on the bible that they will tell the truth.  Whether you like it or not, this nation is at heart a God fearing nation.  Our school problems began when God was ripped out of it.  I can cite example after example the problems that have always occured when we try to rip God out of this nation.  I do not hate athiests, I  do not think that they should hide, but I am proud to declare that I serve One Nation, Under God, and nothing will change that.  the fact of the matter is, the majority of the nation agrees.  The wants of the few do not outweigh the needs of the many, even though many people think it is so.
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

You'll be sorry you messed with, the US of A.  Cause we'll stick our boot up your ass, it's the American Way!

Viva la Toga!!!

the3Djedi
ComNet Initiate
 
 
Post Number:  143
Total Posts:  143
Joined:  Mar 2002
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 9, 2002 8:58:50 PM    View the profile of the3Djedi 
What JMac said. btw, does anyone know WHY they changed it? I do. ----------------------- TRP/LCPL the3djedi/3SQD/1PLT/1COM/1BAT/1RGT/VEA/VE Rank: Corporal My site: http://the3Djedi.150m.com Squad: Raiders Joined: March 28, 2002 Age: 14
[This message has been edited by the3Djedi (edited August 9, 2002 8:59:31 PM)]
Japheth
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Krath Templar (KT)
[VE-NAVY] Rear Admiral (RAD)
[VE-VEHC] Rear Admiral*
 
Post Number:  1197
Total Posts:  2517
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 9, 2002 11:45:21 PM    View the profile of Japheth 
Our money didn't always say 'In god we trust' clinton wasn't sworn in on the bible. First Amendment rocks the house. I have no god.
 
-----------------------
Rear Admiral Japheth Cappadocious, Krath Priest
Naval Executive Officer
Headmaster of the Dark Jedi Order Academy
-----------------------
NXO/RAD Japheth Cappadocious/NHC-2/ISD-II Devastator/VEN/VE/(=SA=)(=SCPA=)(=FCO=)[BRC][MC:1][KC]
HM/KPT Japheth Cappadocious/DC-5/Krath Order/Elite Griffen Sect/VEDJ/VE
Sabre
ComNet Novice
 
[VE-NAVY] Warrant Officer 2nd Class (WO2)
 
Post Number:  65
Total Posts:  65
Joined:  Apr 2002
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 9, 2002 11:53:17 PM    View the profile of Sabre 
He was sworn in on the Bible when he was testifying in court though. Not that it did a lot of good.
 
-----------------------
ADJ:NXO/FL/WO2 Gathon 'Sabre'/Kaph 3-1/Phoenix Wing/mSSD Atrus/DEF/VEN/VE  (=A=)(=SA=)
-Bachelor for life.
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 2:19:09 AM    View the profile of JMac 
Presidents are not sworn in on the bible, but "so help me God" has been an unscripted tradition.  As for the first amendment, that has become an illusion nowadays.  You can say whatever you like, so long as you are very, very carefull not to offend anybody other then white male Christians.  (And that isn't just bluster.  A year or so back a bunch of men attacked a Christian man in his home, having identified him by a Christian sign in his front yard.  They yelled stuff such as "Jesus is gay," "Satan is Lord," etc. etc.  The police caught them, the judge booked them for assaualt and added "hate crime" onto it, giving them the longer sentence thatcomes with the designation.  It was appealed, and the "hate crime" was eventually removed because Christianity is not a protected religion!!!) 3D, they didn't change it.  the judge took back his own ruling after FoxNews(God bless em') gave out his home phone number and the angry calls flooded in.
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

You'll be sorry you messed with, the US of A.  Cause we'll stick our boot up your ass, it's the American Way!

Viva la Toga!!!

Bear
ComNet Member
 
[VE-NAVY] Captain (CAP)
[VE-VEEC] Chief Editor
 
Post Number:  949
Total Posts:  947
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 10:10:42 AM    View the profile of Bear 
Your friendly European friends point of view.. When I went to an American school in the Middle East, there was a US Flag at the front. The teacher said that under American law we were supposed to go up to it every morning and pledge our allegiance to the United States, but since there were so many foreigners (about 1 foreigner for every 2 Americans in my class), that school was exempt. This is fine; I've sworn an allegiance to Queen (!!!) and country out of school, so swearing an oath is nothing new. What tends to look.. hmm.. controversial.. about the American pledge is the part about God. As far as I know, it is: "One nation under God" Sitting outside the great house of America in the garden of the great house of Europe, I can say that from my viewpoint, this line implies that America is "the chosen place". The line implies to the rest of the world that the United States thinks that God chose it, and the rest of us are simply heathens. This does understandably upset several people - the society of some European countries is based around a monarchy (UK, Norway, Holland, Italy etc), which ties it into religion. Religion also plays big parts in shaping the society of other countries (France, Germany, Spain etc), although the church itself has very little power. "One nation under God" upsets Europeans a tiny bit - liberalism (in this case, our "We couldn't care less about those yankees" attitude helps somewhat) makes sure it doesn't make a huge impact. However, as much as we try to say it, Western Liberalism is not the "normal" society for the world. More people live (quite happily, I might add) in less liberal societies, which are shaped less by liberalism and more by religion - Islamic countries being by far the best examples. Let me bring in a quote from a US General when asked by CNN why the Air Force was attacking Afghanistan. The reporter asked: "When will you capture Bin Laden?" To which the general replied: "I don't really think thats the issue here" What was the issue? A lot of people said it was to protect womens rights; some people said it was to get rid of a recessive regime. In the eyes of a lot of Muslims, the Americans were attacking Afghanistan not for oil, not to stop terrorism, but to force their society beliefs on everyone else.. I'm starting to go off subject here, but lets bring something new in. Why do so many Muslims hate America? There are two reasons.. 1) Religion - the belief that an attack on one Muslim is an attack on Islam 2) Sex - More specifically, liberalism. Muslims dislike greatly anything sexual - a porn magazine would give them a heart attack. FHM would give them a stroke. A lingerie advert would give them a seizure. (When I lived in the Middle East, everytime I went into the country I had to declare any magazines and videos I had - anything remotely sexual was ripped out.) Basically, the world objects to "One nation under God" because it gives the idea that the US is Gods country, which at best is not taking other beliefs into account, and at worst is blatantly racist. Athiesm? Its got nothing to do with that - its about respecting other beliefs. America, whether it wants to or not, has an example to set, and subtle things like making five year olds believe that the US is the "Promised Land" is setting the wrong example. Maybe now the US has banned that, Muslim countries will too - the oaths young children (trainee terrorists) have to take in "Terrorist Schools" are modelled almost exactly on the American oaths - which, as far as I can see, are making 16 year old Americans flock to the Marine Corps recruiting offices.
 
-----------------------
        Captain Aaron "Bear" Le'pue, Naval Instructor & VE Today Chief Editor
                                                        ~~~
     INS/CAP Aaron "Bear" Le'pue/Flight School/Training Fleet/ISD II Crusader/VEN/VE
(=A=) (=SA=) (=MA=) (=FOCE=) (=JCPA=) (=SCPA=) [BRC] [BRC] [LSM] [LoC] [NDM]

                                                        ~~~
                                      Bear : [email protected]
                             Vast Empire Today : [email protected]
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 10:47:57 AM    View the profile of JMac 
If you think that American schools are creating people to flock to the US marine corps you are badly mistaken.  I think my beleifs are fairly widely known here, I certainly don't try to hide them : ).  But I am afraid that most of our nations educational facilities do not share in my beleifs.  Many schools have banned playing with GI Joes(marine action figures), because they say the toys teach children violence.  The majority of college profs hate all kinds of violence and anything even remotely conservative, and most schools do all they can to squelch all things that seem even remotely violent.  Our society is changing to make everyone feel better.  The place of Custurd's Last Stand is being renamed, and it is being changed in our textbooks from a sad US defeat to a resounding Indian victory.  If you need further proof that they don't just look at Aargon.  In contrast, the day that all those people were injured when a bomb went off in Israel, killing many people and wounding many more, the Muslim community took to the streets in celibration.  Children as young as fiver were paraded around wearing mock bombs.  I don't see how you can make the comparison there. our As for One Nation, Under God, simply means that we are a united nation, and that our nation is blessed by God.  That doesn't mean that we are God's chosen land.  The Church of England's head is the monarch, I'm sure giving them no amount of pride.  The Vatican is in Italy, and Israel is the nation that God made a covenant with.  Just because we say that our Natin is under God: IE blessed and protected by him, doesn't mean that we the only one, nor that our's is God's chosen race.
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

You'll be sorry you messed with, the US of A.  Cause we'll stick our boot up your ass, it's the American Way!

Viva la Toga!!!

Fury
ComNet Overlord
 
[VE-ARMY] High General
[VE-VEHC] High General*
 
Post Number:  1578
Total Posts:  2689
Joined:  Jun 2000
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 10:51:11 AM    View the profile of Fury 
Not that I have one opinion on this one a certain way or another, but we have never used the concept of "one nation under God" to show we are a "chosen" nation or any such clap trap. Well...it was never intended to be used that way.  Can't claim our doofus-in-chief has not done this a few dozen times. This has been projected onto us by people that don't seem to like us much anyway. The real reason it was done was to show that we have our mandate as a nation not my man, or king or queen, or commonwealth, but by a higher power.  The whole "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" bit you know.  We are a nation (as I have always understood this) because we use God-given rights to form a federated union, not because some remote King said we could. That would be the reason "under God" is prevelant, to disguish us from all the monarchies running around at the time...and to justify the revolt we got into in order to make this country independent.  What you seem to be angry at Bear, is not that we are raising ourselves above everyone else, but that we continue to distinguish ourselves from your form of government. Unfortunately, the origin of this practice seems to have been lost on both sides of the Atlantic...or at least on our current administration.   ----------------------- XO/LTC Fury/VEA/TADATH/VE [PoC][SotE:HC][SotE:VEA][IOC] Company Commander Shopkeeper - Imperial Center
[This message has been edited by Fury (edited August 10, 2002 10:53:21 AM)]
Bear
ComNet Member
 
[VE-NAVY] Captain (CAP)
[VE-VEEC] Chief Editor
 
Post Number:  949
Total Posts:  947
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 11:16:39 AM    View the profile of Bear 
I'm not angry about anything! But this "Britain has a government" concept.. intresting.. Of course, I've grown up in this age, where people only like the Monarchy when they realise it actually has some uses (upsetting foreigners being the most obvious example ). My personal views are that we should believe in our country and what it stands for, and no thing (God or a King, for example) should come into the equation - we should believe in the ideal of the United States, or the ideal of the United Kingdom, or whatever. Of course, I'm a Communist.
 
-----------------------
        Captain Aaron "Bear" Le'pue, Naval Instructor & VE Today Chief Editor
                                                        ~~~
     INS/CAP Aaron "Bear" Le'pue/Flight School/Training Fleet/ISD II Crusader/VEN/VE
(=A=) (=SA=) (=MA=) (=FOCE=) (=JCPA=) (=SCPA=) [BRC] [BRC] [LSM] [LoC] [NDM]

                                                        ~~~
                                      Bear : [email protected]
                             Vast Empire Today : [email protected]
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 11:39:22 AM    View the profile of JMac 
Well said Fury.  You said what I am currently too sleep deprived to say.(28 hours and still going!!!)
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

You'll be sorry you messed with, the US of A.  Cause we'll stick our boot up your ass, it's the American Way!

Viva la Toga!!!

Daishi
ComNet Cadet
 
[VE-NAVY] Rear Admiral (RAD)
[VE-VEHC] El Presidente*
 
Post Number:  214
Total Posts:  243
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 1:02:24 PM    View the profile of Daishi 
The "under god" passage was not even an original part of the pledge of allegiance.  So from my perspective I think it is better we had the pledge back the way it used to be before it was radiclly altered. If you doubt america has a nasty tendancy to force it's morality on other countries/civilizations, stop having it, america does. I can't even be legaly buried in a manor consistant with my religous views, at least not in this state. As for schools programing people to go to the marines, that mostly depends on where you live.  Approximatly 30% of the people I know have had military service or know someone who has had military service(not just marines though).  Though that could just be because this is an econimicly depressed area and there aren't many other options. The Ultimate Heathen strikes again!
 
-----------------------
RA(U) Daishi COSOS
"If we had all knowladge then why would we seek what we already know and if we had no knowladge then how could we even ask the question?"  Plato
"Indeceant exposure is fun." Sonatina
"There are at least three sides to any situation." Me

Raziel
ComNet Member
 
[VE-ARMY] Sergeant Major
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
 
Post Number:  864
Total Posts:  2873
Joined:  Feb 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 1:53:52 PM    View the profile of Raziel 
yeah im so proud of my monarch/head of church hahahahahahaha sorry
 
-----------------------
SL/SGMTRaziel/4SQD/1COMP/1BAT/1RGT/Tadath/VEA/ {EW1} {WoS} {VP}
Squad Leader - Squad4 Wraiths
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989.
Geist
ComNet Initiate
 
 
Post Number:  105
Total Posts:  105
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 10, 2002 7:13:56 PM    View the profile of Geist 
My opinion on the subject as an ardent politically neutral quaker. The moron that started this mess needs to pull the stick out of his rear and get on with his life. I have been graced (or cursed ) with a complete education in our public school system and I can say from years of experience that the average student doesn't give a damn about saying under god any more than they do about the rest of the pledge. This is a non issue made an issue by a very small minority who have nothing better to think about. Its similar to a stink raised by feminists at a university a while back who were upset that the symbols on the women's bathrooms wore dresses (they thought it was sexist, presuming that all women wore dresses) except it got more media exposure than the other incident. The world would be a lot funner place if some people didn't take some things way too seriously.
 
-----------------------
"Some day we'll all look back on this and cringe."
~Uncle Yo-sim, All Knowing Bartender

Fury
ComNet Overlord
 
[VE-ARMY] High General
[VE-VEHC] High General*
 
Post Number:  1578
Total Posts:  2689
Joined:  Jun 2000
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 1:41:06 AM    View the profile of Fury 
Now Daishi, I never said this country never tried to force morality or belief systems on others. For someone who worries about being taken out of context, you sure do take liberties with the practice. I merely said the origin of the god usage in general (Constitution, Bill of Rights, money, etc.) comes from a philosophical system from way back when Franklin was chasing French skirts and Jefferson was sleeping with the help. Yes, we all know well and good that our parents (for some of us), grandparents, et al, did not have to do this early on.  It was basically Ike's big push to enforce morality on this country (which is what the 50s are all about: remember that the next time a politician tries to tell you otherwise). But yes, when we get bogged down over words in the Pledge of Allegiance or 5 million dollar settlements over coffee at McDonald's, it detracts from things like what's in our water, who are we trying to bomb today, and where the hell IS Dick Cheney anyway? Bread and circuses for everyone.  Enjoy it.   ----------------------- XO/LTC Fury/VEA/TADATH/VE [PoC][SotE:HC][SotE:VEA][IOC] Company Commander Shopkeeper - Imperial Center
[This message has been edited by Fury (edited August 11, 2002 1:43:04 AM)]
Geist
ComNet Initiate
 
 
Post Number:  105
Total Posts:  105
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 4:07:36 AM    View the profile of Geist 
Hah, I know what's in my water, but then my dad is a somewhat bored environmental chemist who just happens to have time to test it... Now remember kids, if you drink 47,000 gallons of rainwater all in one sitting you will recieve a serious dose of radiation that orginally came from a certain reactor in the ukrain. Okay, you won't. It will be less than you get in a thyroid test, but it is still worth worrying about, isn't it?
 
-----------------------
"Some day we'll all look back on this and cringe."
~Uncle Yo-sim, All Knowing Bartender

Liquid
ComNet Member
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] 1st Lieutenant (1LT)
 
Post Number:  612
Total Posts:  679
Joined:  Feb 2002
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 11:00:33 AM    View the profile of Liquid 
i'd like to know how we're "forcing" people to say the pledge...are we being punished if we don't? no, i don't say the pledge, and i have not been in trouble once for it, sure, i have to stand during the pledge, but, i, in the end, have the ultimate decision of whether or not i'm gonna say the "damned" words. "One nations under God" i don't see what's so frickin' wrong with the word "God" i may be a christian, but, that doesn't mean that i have to make everyone that is around me a christian, sure, my actions are supposed to be affirming of Christ, and my body is a temple of the Lord. but, that's saying more than i should, and, getting off subject. Anywho, the majority of the nation wouldn't have given a damn whether or not it said "God" in the pledge, and most were just fine either saying it or not. the only reason this guy did anything was either out of pure boredom, or, his little girl's a spoiled little b*tch. i'm betting that it's the latter.   (btw: 200th post!!!) ----------------------- ADJ:NTO/IA/EFL/WO1 Liquid/Aegis 3-1 (Aegis Nine)/Phoenix Wing/mSSD Atrus/DEF/VEN/VE/(=A=)(=SA=) TRN/JRN Liquid/TBA/TBA/VEDJ/(VP) I am the TO's Adjutant, and the FS's instructor's assistant. Any questions? please direct them to: Me Aegis ||| Naval Academy ||| Flight School
[This message has been edited by Liquid (edited August 11, 2002 11:01:55 AM)]
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 11:49:17 AM    View the profile of JMac 
Actually, the little girl's mother is a devoted Christian who split with the father, and she raised the girl as such.  The girl never had any problem with the pledge.  Her father is just a POS that decided to use his daughter to maybe get some sympathy for the suit.  Yes, in the days where fast food resturants are sued for making people fat and a dog is sentenced to death for racial profiling, we are taking ourselves way too seriously and have become far too sensitive as a culture.
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

You'll be sorry you messed with, the US of A.  Cause we'll stick our boot up your ass, it's the American Way!

Viva la Toga!!!

Liquid
ComNet Member
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] 1st Lieutenant (1LT)
 
Post Number:  612
Total Posts:  679
Joined:  Feb 2002
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 12:10:39 AM    View the profile of Liquid 
so...i was correct in assuming that it was the latter.
 
-----------------------
ADJ:NTO/IA/EFL/WO1 Liquid/Aegis 3-1 (Aegis Nine)/Phoenix Wing/mSSD Atrus/DEF/VEN/VE/(=A=)(=SA=)

TRN/JRN Liquid/TBA/TBA/VEDJ/(VP)

I am the TO's Adjutant, and the FS's instructor's assistant. Any questions? please direct them to: Me

Aegis ||| Naval Academy ||| Flight School
Liquid
ComNet Member
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] 1st Lieutenant (1LT)
 
Post Number:  612
Total Posts:  679
Joined:  Feb 2002
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 12:10:43 AM    View the profile of Liquid 
(sorry, double post)   ----------------------- ADJ:NTO/IA/EFL/WO1 Liquid/Aegis 3-1 (Aegis Nine)/Phoenix Wing/mSSD Atrus/DEF/VEN/VE/(=A=)(=SA=) TRN/JRN Liquid/TBA/TBA/VEDJ/(VP) I am the TO's Adjutant, and the FS's instructor's assistant. Any questions? please direct them to: Me Aegis ||| Naval Academy ||| Flight School
[This message has been edited by Liquid (edited August 11, 2002 12:11:59 AM)]
Riel Fury
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Krath Oracle (KO)
[VE-NAVY] Rear Admiral (RAD)
[VE-VEHC] Rear Admiral*
 
Post Number:  1141
Total Posts:  1298
Joined:  Sep 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 3:56:02 PM    View the profile of Riel Fury 
The fact of the matter is no one gives a damn about what oaths they give.  Personally, if I pledge alliegance to something, I take it VERY seriously.  At school, I stood up and proudly said the pledge because damnit, I'm proud to be an american, and I will serve my country in any way they so need.  That doesn't mean I don't see flaws in the system, I see them every day.  I listen to Anti-Flag and get pissed off at the CIA daily.  One nation under god... a higher power.  We don't answer to Britain, or to the Netherlands, or to Morocco.  We are an independant nation answerable to ourselves and to God (whatever God you may believe in.)  The athiests may get pissed, but don't they get pissed at everything anyway?
 
-----------------------
Rear Admiral Riel Fury
Navy Commander In Chief
Krath Prophet(ess), Dark Lord of the Krath, Cult Member in Elite Griffen Sect
Give in to your hatred.  Give in to your anger.  Give in to the Dark Side.
Argon Viper
ComNet Expert
 
[VE-ARMY] Sergeant Major
[VE-VEEC] Senior Writer
 
Post Number:  1789
Total Posts:  1789
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 5:41:19 PM    View the profile of Argon Viper 
So basically, the argument here is that the words "under God" are nothing to get PO'd about, but you're going to PO'd over them anyways  Get real, religion is a huge deal, and anyone who says otherwise is either a con man or a filthy liar.  A person's deepest beliefs are not something to be trifled with lightly, which is why, when you try to change something that affects them, you go in full force. "No warning, no rules, no mercy" - Argon Viper I don't think anyone here is getting how dangerous these topics can be.  In fact, religion was and still is the cause of well over 50% of the wars on this planet. Now, what I was trying to show by this topic(and I can see now that I completely failed at it) is that the state should never, ever, support a single religion.  Religion should not be part of a state. Case in point, let's examine all the states that gave themselves over to religion. Spain - The Inquisition, 'nuff said Britain - Their kings went way over the line before being brought down finally Egypt - The priests got so much power they even assassinated the Pharoahs themselves(remember good old Tutankhamon?) China - Communism can be considered a religion... The US itself - Right now, people who fight for religious freedom get death threats, how free is that really? Anyways, I hope I proved at least one point.  If I haven't, go back and reread it, it will come to you eventually. Anyways, if you read the article(doubtful, but still), you'll notice some of the references to the founding fathers.  Most of them got this nation started without the intention of ever letting religion in at all, that's the entire reason for the first amendment. So those of you who say that God is part of the true American way, think twice 
 
-----------------------
Argon Viper
IW COL Argon Viper{ret}
"History is on the move, those who cannot keep up will watch from a distance, and those who get in our way will not watch at all" - Grand Admiral Thrawn
"In combat, second place is only the last to die."- Anonymous
"Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses" - Carl G Jung
"The only thing that will never change is that everything will change" - Argon Viper
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 6:39:47 PM    View the profile of JMac 
Two things:  How do the words "under God" make us support only one religion.  Pretty much all major religions fit under that.  And secondly, what people fighting for religious freedom?  We are so PC nowadays that the only religion you can bash without a multi-million dollar lawsuit is Christianity.  All other religions are covered.
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

"Court is in session, a verdict is in.  No appeal on the docket today, just my own sin.  The walls cold and pale, the cage made of steel.  Screams fill the room, alone I drop and kneel. Silnce now the sound, my breath the only motion around.  Demons cluttering around, my face showing no emotion.  Shackled by my sins and expecting no return.  here there is no pennance, my skin begins to burn."
~Creed
Riel Fury
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Krath Oracle (KO)
[VE-NAVY] Rear Admiral (RAD)
[VE-VEHC] Rear Admiral*
 
Post Number:  1141
Total Posts:  1298
Joined:  Sep 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 11, 2002 9:45:08 PM    View the profile of Riel Fury 
That is a good point.  There are many correlations about the majority getting screwed in this society.  White Anglo-Saxon male who is christian is protectected by whom?  ACLU?  NAACP?  Who?  No One.  They're screwed.  If you're a woman, you have NOW on your side.  We need to start an organization to protect us, too.
 
-----------------------
Rear Admiral Riel Fury
Navy Commander In Chief
Krath Prophet(ess), Dark Lord of the Krath, Cult Member in Elite Griffen Sect
Give in to your hatred.  Give in to your anger.  Give in to the Dark Side.
Fury
ComNet Overlord
 
[VE-ARMY] High General
[VE-VEHC] High General*
 
Post Number:  1578
Total Posts:  2689
Joined:  Jun 2000
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 12, 2002 7:53:02 AM    View the profile of Fury 
I would call that a bit premature given that you still have buddies at the Republican Party Actually, what IS the defining line that would warrant organizational protection?  Does a white Baptist church need to be bombed?  Does a black cop need to beat some white kid's head against a squad car in full view of a vidcam?  Does a gang need to go out of territory and take down people at random in the 'burbs? Basically, is it a reverse discrimatory question or one of public safety? And who gets to decide? Thoughts?
 
-----------------------
XO/LTC Fury/VEA/TADATH/VE [PoC][SotE:HC][SotE:VEA][IOC]
Company Commander
Shopkeeper - Imperial Center
Argon Viper
ComNet Expert
 
[VE-ARMY] Sergeant Major
[VE-VEEC] Senior Writer
 
Post Number:  1789
Total Posts:  1789
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 12, 2002 10:55:15 AM    View the profile of Argon Viper 
Yeah, the basic idea behind these protections of minorities is the simple fact that even if they wanted to, they couldn't do nearly as much as the majority(which happens to be hovering at nearly a 10th grade education at the moment...).  Personally, I agree with a lot of the stuff coming out now, because, as Fury said, you have to look pretty hard to see a black cop beating the $h*t out of a white kid. And JMac, the words "Under God" don't make us support only one religion.  However, they are quite limited to only 3.  It does nothing for Atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, and all the other Godless or Polytheistic views. The simple fact is that the American way was not based on a God at all, in fact, most of the founding fathers were humanists, believers that God created us but that we were there to decide our own way, not Christians as is publicly touted. They drafted the first amendment after taking a look at several other cultures of the time that had dedicated themselves to a single religion.  I think that this lesson is one we should take to heart, what's the point of studying history if not to learn from it? Anyways, I'm gonna prove my point here and now about the dangers of messing with someone's religious beliefs.  If I had posted something about the fact that Stanford Campus is a "dry"(non-alkyholic) campus, do you think I would've had this many responses this fast?
 
-----------------------
Argon Viper
IW COL Argon Viper{ret}
"History is on the move, those who cannot keep up will watch from a distance, and those who get in our way will not watch at all" - Grand Admiral Thrawn
"In combat, second place is only the last to die."- Anonymous
"Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses" - Carl G Jung
"The only thing that will never change is that everything will change" - Argon Viper
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 12, 2002 11:32:16 AM    View the profile of JMac 
Fury, all those things happen all the time.  They just aren't reported by anyone other then FoxNews because everyone is afraid of appearing rascist.  Aargon, I didn't say it supported only one. 
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

"Court is in session, a verdict is in.  No appeal on the docket today, just my own sin.  The walls cold and pale, the cage made of steel.  Screams fill the room, alone I drop and kneel. Silnce now the sound, my breath the only motion around.  Demons cluttering around, my face showing no emotion.  Shackled by my sins and expecting no return.  Here there is no pennance, my skin begins to burn."
~Creed
Fury
ComNet Overlord
 
[VE-ARMY] High General
[VE-VEHC] High General*
 
Post Number:  1578
Total Posts:  2689
Joined:  Jun 2000
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 12, 2002 2:08:57 PM    View the profile of Fury 
You might be right about that JMac. I wouldn't know.  If I watch more than 20 minutes of FoxNews, my body revolts against me and I have to go purge myself or something.  I can't listen to that much hate and bias without needing to remove myself from it. My point is this: excluding Japheth's real life problem of finding no means of paying for his education other than work study or just plain work (putting him at a disadvantage of time for studying), in most instances, being a white male in this country means preferential treatment for damn near everything. Now this may not apply to where you live, but travel around the country, go to various cities, towns, states, and whatnot and you will find that life is a lot easier and less stressful. The funny thing is, as I meet with American expatriats around the world, the one thing the long-term "I'm never going back" types are not: white males. As for religion, whether or not the founding fathers believed in a higher power or not (they would be the only true sources, and as such, cannot be reached for comment), the implied sense in all our original documentation is that they did try to base this country on a standard above that of a petty heriditary monarchy.  The goal it seems was that our rights as humans granted by something better than us guided our ability to form a nation. While I will agree that this was a largely Christian bent given the predominance of worship at the time, I will also say that the cards were pretty stacked against rational, pragmatic atheists who just believed in the goodness of man.  So, we do have some form of religious favoritism in the work, implied and otherwise.  This has been pretty narrowed over time but I still gotta think that the consensus of these guys was to have some focus on faith, in whatever form. Whenever you guys are done with this discussion, how about a real, serious talk about what atheism is, is not, and throw in the agnostics too please.  I'd like to actually hear this from those who called themselves atheist or agnostic so others can get a general sense of where you are coming from.   ----------------------- XO/LTC Fury/VEA/TADATH/VE [PoC][SotE:HC][SotE:VEA][IOC] Company Commander Shopkeeper - Imperial Center
[This message has been edited by Fury (edited August 12, 2002 2:11:19 PM)]
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 12, 2002 5:20:34 PM    View the profile of JMac 
FoxNews rules!!!  All news networks are biased, it is just that Fox is biased in my direction, whereas the rest are liberal.  As for the other debate, I'm all for it.  i'm afraid I can't shine much light on the atheist or agnostic point of view, though, as my beliefs do not lie in that area.
 
-----------------------
NTO/LCM JMac/ISD Overlord/Raptor 9/(=A=)(=SA=)(MC1)

"Court is in session, a verdict is in.  No appeal on the docket today, just my own sin.  The walls cold and pale, the cage made of steel.  Screams fill the room, alone I drop and kneel. Silnce now the sound, my breath the only motion around.  Demons cluttering around, my face showing no emotion.  Shackled by my sins and expecting no return.  Here there is no pennance, my skin begins to burn."
~Creed
Geist
ComNet Initiate
 
 
Post Number:  105
Total Posts:  105
Status:  Offline
  RE: A very controversial issue
August 13, 2002 1:41:58 AM    View the profile of Geist 
I have never met a real athiest, and I tend to believe that a pure athiest does not exist, each man has his own gods even if they choose not to call them god, yahweh, jehova, allah, amaterasu, budah, shiva, etc. And yes Argon, before you ask, this includes you too, ESPECIALLY you.
 
-----------------------
"Some day we'll all look back on this and cringe."
~Uncle Yo-sim, All Knowing Bartender

ComNet > Neutral Messages > Archived Lounge > A very controversial issue  |  New Posts    
  Pages:  [ 1 2 ]   

All times are CST. The time now is 5:24:17 PM
Comnet Jump:

Current Online Members - 1  |  Guests - 301  |  Bots - 2
Kadann
 
< Contact Us - The Vast Empire >
 
Powered by ComNet Version 7.2
Copyright © 1998-2025 The Imperial Network
 
This page was generated in 1.218 seconds.