Communications Network
Vast Empire  -  New Posts  -  Search  -  Statistics  -  Login 
 
ComNet > Neutral Messages > Archived Lounge > A good controversial topic
 
 
 
Author
Topic:  A good controversial topic
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 23, 2001 11:05:55 PM    View the profile of JMac 
Here is a topic sure to spark a feirce debate.  Abortion- A woman's right or infanticide?
 
-----------------------
FM/LCRW JMac/Aegis 3-4/Aegis 12/(=A=)
"He who can still laugh can still survive."
"Ye though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death I will fear no evil, for I am the meanest SOB ever to walk the valley.      ~Vietnam Creedo
Bear
ComNet Member
 
[VE-NAVY] Captain (CAP)
[VE-VEEC] Chief Editor
 
Post Number:  949
Total Posts:  947
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 24, 2001 5:39:14 AM    View the profile of Bear 
What a woman does with her own body is up to her, and, because we have the facilities to do things properly, doctors should help women abort their fetus' properly. Kelly wants to get a tattoo (of a lobster on her "lower back" ), and I respect that if she wants it, although I don't want her too. However, I can't stand the thought of some guy sticking a rusty needle into her, so I'd do anything I could to make sure it was done properly.. see what I mean?
 
-----------------------
TO/LCM Bear/Raptor 1-2/VE/VEN/(=A=) (=SA=) (=MA=) (=FOCE=) (=JCPA=) (=SCPA=) [BRC] [BRC] [NDM] [LSM]

Lieutenant Commander Bear
Navy Training Officer

Vast Empire Assistant Ambassador
Riel Fury
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Krath Oracle (KO)
[VE-NAVY] Rear Admiral (RAD)
[VE-VEHC] Rear Admiral*
 
Post Number:  1141
Total Posts:  1298
Joined:  Sep 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 24, 2001 8:13:35 AM    View the profile of Riel Fury 
I hope you don't mind me staying out of this topic.  I have a feeling that my opinions are rather caustic and I don't wish to offend anyone.
 
-----------------------
Officer Candidate Riel Fury
Squadron Commander
Aegis Squadron
Gold Recruitment Commendation
Wing Commander Wing One
Victory Cross w/ Silver Trim
VE Pothead and Reborn Pimp
Warmaker
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Captain (CAP)
 
Post Number:  1023
Total Posts:  1031
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 24, 2001 9:01:30 AM    View the profile of Warmaker 
Hey a little Tatoo on the right place looks not to bad
 
-----------------------
FM/LCRW Warmaker/Viper 3-2/WING I/mSSD Atrus/VE/VEN
You can run but you cannot hide
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 24, 2001 9:50:57 AM    View the profile of JMac 
I have no pproblem with a woman  doing whatever she wants to her body, but killing someone else is murder. If you kill a baby5 seconds before it is born it is a legal abortion, if you kill it after its head pops out it is murder.  Something is not right with this picture.
 
-----------------------
FM/LCRW JMac/Aegis 3-4/Aegis 12/(=A=)
"He who can still laugh can still survive."
"Ye though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death I will fear no evil, for I am the meanest SOB ever to walk the valley.      ~Vietnam Creedo
Fallen
ComNet Member
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] 2nd Lieutenant (2LT)
 
Post Number:  506
Total Posts:  506
Joined:  Sep 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 24, 2001 11:06:00 AM    View the profile of Fallen 
It's a sensitive issue.
 
-----------------------
[Navy - Fallen] FM/WO2 Fallen/Aegis 3-3/1/mSSD Atrus/1ESF/VE/VEN/(=A=)
[Army - Raxen] ETRP/CPL Raxen/1SQD/1PLT/1COM/1BAT/1RGT/VEA/VE

'Long Live the Vast Empire. And my TIE Bomber.'
Bear
ComNet Member
 
[VE-NAVY] Captain (CAP)
[VE-VEEC] Chief Editor
 
Post Number:  949
Total Posts:  947
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
November 24, 2001 12:15:46 AM    View the profile of Bear 
I don't know how it works where you live, but its illegal to abort after 4 months (or about that), because if the baby is born after 4 months of pregnancy, it can, theoretically, survive outside the womb. Anything after 4 months is murder, and probably wrong..
 
-----------------------
TO/LCM Bear/Raptor 1-2/VE/VEN/(=A=) (=SA=) (=MA=) (=FOCE=) (=JCPA=) (=SCPA=) [BRC] [BRC] [NDM] [LSM]

Lieutenant Commander Bear
Navy Training Officer

Vast Empire Assistant Ambassador
War Woman
ComNet Novice
 
 
Post Number:  31
Total Posts:  31
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
December 8, 2001 9:15:01 AM    View the profile of War Woman 
I know that i am off topic but i just wanted to say that my friend she would of had 3 more siblings but her mom killed all three of then and now she is the only child. Does anyone think thats right?
Argon Viper
ComNet Expert
 
[VE-ARMY] Sergeant Major
[VE-VEEC] Senior Writer
 
Post Number:  1789
Total Posts:  1789
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
December 8, 2001 11:33:01 PM    View the profile of Argon Viper 
Depends on the reason.  A hooker who has an abortion is a bad thing cause then she'll keep doing it.  But someone who is not at a point in their life where they can handle kids should be allowed to.  My opinion is the matter of sentience.  When a baby is sentient, then it's murder.  However, by our own rules about sentience, Chimps are also sentient.  So, until we make it illegal to kill a chimp, I can use that as a precedent.  If you are willing to declare killing a chimp murder(it would still stick to the same basic rules), then I wouldn't see a problem with the anti-abortion stuff.  Sorry to introduce another topic here, but we humans are rather self centered.
 
-----------------------
Argon Viper
"History is on the move, those who cannot keep up will watch from a distance, and those who get in our way will not watch at all" - Grand Admiral Thrawn
"He who knows his enemy, needs not fear confrontation" - Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
"Insanity is not a mental condition, it's a way of life" - Argon Viper
"Those who run from death, win little.  Those who simply live their lives, win much" - Argon Viper
Bear
ComNet Member
 
[VE-NAVY] Captain (CAP)
[VE-VEEC] Chief Editor
 
Post Number:  949
Total Posts:  947
Joined:  Apr 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
December 9, 2001 8:00:32 AM    View the profile of Bear 
Abortion is a debate which sometimes verges on the debate of contraception.. My personal views are: If a woman has sex without either person using contraception, she is taking the risk to be impregnated and should not be allowed to abort her foetus. If the woman or the man DO use contraception, and it fails (i.e. the condom splits), then the woman has been impregnated against her own will, so she should be allowed to abort her child. The same also goes for rape victims - if a woman is made pregnant by her rapist, she should be allowed to abort the foetus.
 
-----------------------
TO/LCM Bear/Raptor 1-2/VE/VEN/(=A=) (=SA=) (=MA=) (=FOCE=) (=JCPA=) (=SCPA=) [BRC] [BRC] [NDM] [LSM]

Lieutenant Commander Bear
Navy Training Officer

Vast Empire Assistant Ambassador
JMac
ComNet Veteran
 
[VE-DJO] Dark Jedi Knight (DJK)
[VE-NAVY] Lt. Commander (LCM)
 
Post Number:  1029
Total Posts:  1216
Joined:  Nov 2001
Status:  Offline
  RE: A good controversial topic
December 9, 2001 5:05:14 PM    View the profile of JMac 
I haven't posted here for awhile since I figured that it wasn't the place for this discussion but since it has been reopened here goes. First of all, no contraception save surgery is 100% effectivre, so they would still be taking a risk, and the condom splitting would not have the person be unwillfully impregnated.  If the person was willing to drop their pants, they are taking a risk of getting pregnant.  In the case of rape it still isn't right, that would be like murdering an innocent bystander who happened to be there at the scene of a crime. As for the laws, they are hypocritical to the extreme.  They say that it is murder if the being is self sufficent.  But really, if you take a one year old and push it out the door, would it be able to survive without outside help?  In order for a person to be declared legally dead, theyt must have no heartbeat and no discernable brain activity.  Yet an unborn fetus is  not considered fully alive by our laws despite the fact that by the time it is even detectable it has a functioning circulatory and nervous system.  Doesn't this seem wrong to some of you?  As for chimps, they do not function on the same level of conciosness as we do, so killing them should not be murder. 
 
-----------------------
[army] Fishman
FM/LCRW JMac/Aegis 3-4/Aegis 12/(=A=)
"He who can still laugh can still survive."
"Eagles may soar, but weasels never get sucked into jet engines."
Tall, dark, handsome, and all around stud.
ComNet > Neutral Messages > Archived Lounge > A good controversial topic  |  New Posts    
 

All times are CST. The time now is 11:53:59 PM
Comnet Jump:

Current Online Members - 0  |  Guests - 130  |  Bots - 1
 
< Contact Us - The Vast Empire >
 
Powered by ComNet Version 7.2
Copyright © 1998-2024 The Imperial Network
 
This page was generated in 0.681 seconds.