Why did no-one say at the start that there already was an NPC SCO for Jexxel? Sheesh.

And I've already added it back in. When DeepSix comes up with his description, it can be edited.

Because it was the SCO who set the task, and he made no reference to any existing names. Ergo, it was assumed that there were no names.

Also, like I said before, I checked the Adjudicator page, which lists the squadrons and their SCOs. It said "Unknown NPC", and, until I updated it again, then said the NPC I gave it. The fact that it had been failed to be updated wasn't my fault. I followed orders to the letter.

Changed after all the hard work, and before anyone pointed it out to me. I showed off the jexxel page to people before editing other pages, and all I got was praise. Therefore, how was I meant to know? Answer? I wasn't.

You've made your position very clear. I thank you for your kindness.

Praise I was referring to came from the IRC.

Of course, all this could have been solved had detail been given. It seems to be lacking around here. As is trust and respect. At the moment, the only people on here I have trust and respect for, is Trykon and Serpent. DeepSix also. But that's it. This, currently, is OOC.

Like I said before: I was doing my job. So sue me.

Trust and respect work both ways.

Okay, seriously?

I make one post mentioning a fairly simple thing and 9 or so hours later I find this thread filled with replies that somehow started from that initial comment?

Just to clarify - I was personally neither mad nor angry about that change, which realistically speaking isn't even all that big to begin with. I may have been somewhat annoyed that the change occurred without my knowledge hence the reason for me posting in the first place, but the way I saw it things could and really should've gone a lot differently from that point onwards - namely a simple retcon in two or three pages and that was supposed to be the end of everything.

I never wanted my post to lead to bickering, more edits, excuses to and from other people and so on...

As was made apparent from some of these posts, Gur did indeed make an honest mistake - one that most others failed to notice on account of it being really small to begin with. It was eventually spotted and fixed so I for one am willing to overlook it and move on - a course of action I advise everyone else that partook in the above discussion to take.

I do not wish for this particular issue to change the good things we have going and end up making some of the members feel more restrained as a result. To this end I propose that each member be allowed free reign over his/her personal wiki page. I also suggest that said members be allowed to change their own personal information should it be found in Squadron wikis, Wing wiki, Ship wiki. Whether they can do it themselves right off the bat, do it after they informed the ones responsible for those wikis or just have the latter do it on their behalf - that decision I leave up to the Squadron Commanders as far as their own squadrons are concerned, myself as far as the entire wing is concerned or Trykon as far as ship related things are concerned. My advice here - ask one of the above before editing on his/her page and see how the former chooses to deal with the matter.

On this note I hope the above issue has ended. As in no more posts, inflammatory or otherwise, regarding it. No explanations, no excuses, no thanking, no nothing of any kind. Seriously, I don't want to see this derailing once again...

And speaking of this derailing Gur, Hades already reprimanded you above so I won't bother doing it again myself. I'm not saying all the above is your fault alone and you should as such be held responsible for it. I am however saying that you are not alas blameless in it either. Like it or not your attitude here has helped make things worse overall. My suggestion in the future - read and reread your posts before you submit them and in so doing consider their implications and the way they're likely to be taken by the ones they're meant to as well as all others reading them on the sidelines. A delayed but clear headed reply is often preferable to one written when still being frustrated, angry or mad - regardless of whether you're right or not.

Should you have any questions/comments about the above paragraph I expect to see them relayed via PM (Comnet or IRC). As before, I'm hoping nobody else will further inflame this other issue either with opinions pro/against or other suggestions. Let bygones be bygones and instead move forward. Consider the current story - discuss what you want to happen next and start working on those or other useful angles...

As far as I know, no one is set to post.

Also, forgot to mention it's reports day. So make sure to get yours in!

Speaking of us, Joamer and I are collaborating a post right now.

Time for all hell to break loose!

I can't help but think of this song for this fight. Also Strillians, time to get posting. We've got 3 squadrons of TIE Interceptors and 6 transports. Take down those TIEs!

Writing my post as we speak.

At least you let us know, Gur. Real life always comes first. Whatever it is you're going through, I hope it gets sorted out

For the rest of you, it is reports day! Make sure to get yours in!

I'm writing a post right now.

Gur, you know I'm writing a post right now?