So I always find this an interesting topic to discuss. We have particular soft rules for the DJO on this issue, but thought it would be fun to chat about on here.
How do we decide what is a canonical source?
The Star Wars universe is a mass of information from a variety of sources. However, people often take what is written down on Wookiepedia etc as gospel, without taking into account where it has come from.
For example, the abilities of Jedi, and technologies on display in the games are often tailored for the requirements of the game's mechanics and may not fit in with established canon. Force Unleashed versus Jedi Outcast is a good example of this.
The Clone Wars tv series. On top of being a steaming pile of turd, the series often strays away from existing canon and doesn't even seem to maintain self consistency at times. Yet the Clone Wars series is officially considered higher canon than the EU novels. I certainly wouldn't. Even relative to the prequel trilogy, it's little more than a marketing exercise for kid's toys.
On the other hand sometimes information from games can be useful, I know Fury has found the relative stats of ships from certain D20 sources to be quite helpful, even if they don't always seem to match what is seen on screen in absolute terms.
So, how do we deal with all this?
I think the main answer is just for everyone to
be careful and sensible. When you read a wookiepedia article
look carefully at the sources. Something taken from the films is clearly the best source*. EU books are generally good. Comics have been going for a long time and seem to have a lot of conflicting storylines. Anything taken purely from games, and I include D20 and RPG stuff in this, should generally be taken with a pinch of salt.
At the same time you have to remember that a lot of stuff in the films is there for visual effectiveness. Sometimes it makes no real sense and we shouldn't feel too constrained about straying away from what is displayed sometimes. (Advise this is always done with consultation as below). We do this a lot in the DJO.
To take a quote about the droids talking to each other in the prequel trilogy: "You know, we could probably coordinate our forces a lot better if we had built-in WLAN. But I am sure saying "Roger Roger" in clear english will somehow terrify our enemies."
Would battle droids talk to each other in real-time spoken English? Of course not. And so I'd never have qualms about describing battle droids, even the models from the films, as using some other form of communication.
If in doubt ask your divisional leaders on a particular matter. They may in turn ask the High Council who have overall responsibility for making sure out own canon is consistent.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Another interesting question is how to deal with the new films being made? They could shit all over our established canon, but at the same time they may add some very interesting story features we may want to build into out own.
*A good example of where this gets confusing imo is that a lot of people took the following line: "I see you have constructed a new lightsaber. Your skills are complete." to mean that the construction of a lightsaber was the final part of a Jedi's training. To my knowledge this hasn't been repeated in the prequel trilogy where the Jedi seem to have a much more blasé attitude towards an individual lightsaber.
[This message has been edited by
Raziel
(edited February 5, 2013
5:42:35 AM)]
[This message has been edited by
Raziel
(edited February 5, 2013
5:42:58 AM)]
[This message has been edited by
Raziel
(edited February 5, 2013
5:58:29 AM)]
[This message has been edited by
Raziel
(edited February 5, 2013
6:00:50 AM)]